Posts Tagged ‘Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq’

May Day photo gallery: Texas, Wisconsin, and around the world

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

Istanbul--200,000 rally at Taksim Square (photo Reuters-Stringer)

 May 1, 2011, Istanbul, Turkey–200,000 people march.  Milwaukee, Wisconsin–100,000.  These were among the largest events in the world on May Day, International Workers Day–or simply Labor Day for most of the world, El Dia del Trabajo. 

 Born in the U.S. in 1886 in the struggle for the 8-hour day, May Day was associated with anarchists, socialists, and communists, so the U.S. government undermined it with the establishment of a new and innocuous “Labor Day” holiday in September.  Kept barely alive by a few leftists, May Day was brought back to the U.S. in a big way by immigrants in 2006 and became a big day for the expression of immigrant issues and the demand for immigrant rights.  As U.S. workers tried to reclaim our holiday,

Milwaukee (photo Tom Lynn, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel)

 consciousness grew about the need for solidarity with workers all over the world, and more U.S. workers joined with immigrants in the celebration of this holiday.  The biggest expression of this unity in 2011 was in Wisconsin. 

Some of the issues around the world:  More jobs, union rights, better working conditions, higher wages to counter higher prices for food and fuel; migrant worker rights; an end to the growing income gap between rich and poor; democratic political rights and an end to autocratic governments; an end to the U.S. occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Ciudad Monte, Tamaulipas, Mexico--workers remember the "martyrs of Chicago" along with their own fallen comrades (noticiaselmexicano.com) Dhaka, Bangladesh (photo Pavel Rahman-AP)

Beirut, Lebanon (photo Migrant Workers Task Force)

Ankara, Turkey (photo Umit Bektas-Reuters)

Manila, Philippines--workers demand immediate wage increase, burn President Benigno Aquino III in effigy (photo Aaron Favila-AP)Jakarta, Indonesia (photo Irwin Fedriansyah-AP)

Hyderabad--All India Trade Union Congress (photo Mahesh Kumar A.-AP)

Mumbai--Striking Air India pilots (photo Vivek Prakash-Reuters)

Katmandu--Supporters of CP (Maoist) and activists of Nepal Trade Union (photo Binod Joshi-AP)

Baghdad--Members of the Iraqi Communist Party (photo Khalid Mohammed-AP)

Basra (Federation of Workers' Councils and Unions in Iraq--uslaboragainstwar.org)

Cairo, Egypt--May Day in Tahrir Square (photo Khalil Hamra-AP)

Lahore, Pakistan--Union workers rally (photo K.M. Chaudary-AP)

Madrid, Spain (photo Arturo Rodriguez-AP)

Moscow, Russia--members of the Left Front (photo Ivan Sekretarev-AP)

Lisbon, Portugal--Against the IMF, for Leftist Unity (photo Armando Franca-AP)

Caracas, Venezuela (photo Ariana Cubillos-AP)

Havana, Cuba--Students in Revolution Square (photo Enrique de la Osa-Reuters)

Mexico City--Workers protesting labor law "reform" burn image of Labor Secretary Javier Lozano (photo Marco Ugarte-AP)

Houston (thefirecollective.org)

Houston (thefirecollective.org)

Dallas (labordallas.org)

San Antonio (blogs.sacurrent.com)

Atlanta, GA--Protesters urge Gov. Nathan Deal to veto anti-immigrant legislation (photo Rich Addicks-AP)

New York--rally for jobs and immigrant rights (photo Seth Wenig-AP)

Los Angeles, California (photo L.A. County Federation of Labor)

Milwaukee--Voces de la Frontera has been organizing big May Day marches since 2006 (photo Tom Lynn-Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel)

Milwaukee--This says it all (photo Tom Lynn-Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel)

Iraq: Citizens, workers take to the streets; “in 8 years nothing has changed”

Sunday, March 27th, 2011

http://www.truth-out.org/for-iraqs-unemployed-nothing-has-changed-eight-years68633  TxLAW note:  David Bacon is one of the most knowledgeable writers on Iraqi workers and unions.  Anything by Mr. Bacon is well worth reading.  He’s also a terrific photographer: http://dbacon.igc.org/

Iraqis Take to the Streets, Call for Real Democracy

Friday 25 March 2011: by: David Bacon, t r u t h o u t | News AnalysisIraqis Take to the Streets, Call for Real Democracy
Iraqi street children sleep on the sidewalk. (Photo: David Bacon)

The war in Iraq is supposedly over. The US administration says the occupation, which began on March 20 eight years ago, is ending as well, with the withdrawal of US combat troops. But as the US, Great Britain and France begin another military intervention in North Africa, their respective administrations are silent about the price Iraqis are paying for the last one.

The Iraqis, however, are not remaining silent. Demonstrations have taken place in Baghdad, Basra and Kirkuk, among other cities, calling on the US in particular to stop its escalating military intervention in Libya. Iraqi unions have been especially vocal, linking the US invasion of Iraq with continued misery for its working people. According to one union representative, Abdullah Muhsin of the General Federation of Iraqi Workers (GFIW), “Eight years have ended since the fall of Saddam’s regime, yet the empty promises of the ‘liberators’ – the invaders and the occupiers who promised Iraqis heaven and earth – were simply lies, lies and lies.”

The GFIW, which supported the recent uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East, says the US should “allow the people of Libya, Bahrain and other countries to determine their own destiny by themselves.” Falah Alwan, president of the Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq, says violence directed against workers and unions is intended to keep a lid on protests against miserable living conditions. “We are still under occupation,” he charges. “The new Iraqi army, created by the US occupation, is doing the same job, protecting the corrupt government while we are suffering from the difficulties of daily life.”

“There’s no electricity most of the time and no drinking water – no services at all,” says Qasim Hadi, president of the Union of Unemployed of Iraq (UUI). Eight years after the start of the US military intervention, “there’s hardly even any repair of the war damage – there’s still rubble in the streets. People are going hungry.”

Despite often extreme levels of violence in the years of occupation, Iraqis have never stopped protesting these conditions. When demonstrations broke out in other countries of the Middle East and North Africa, people in Baghdad, Basra and Kirkuk had been taking to the streets for years. In large part, protests continued in Iraq because living conditions never changed, despite promises of what the fall of Saddam Hussein would bring.

“There has basically been no change in the unemployment situation since the occupation started,” Hadi charges. “There are more than 10 million unemployed people in Iraq – about 60-70% of the workforce.” According to the UUI, government unemployment statistics are artificially low because they don’t count many people. “Women aren’t counted,” Hadi says, citing just one example, “because the government says their husbands or fathers are responsible for supporting them.” 

Falah Alwan (right) and workers at a demonstration for labor rights in Baghdad.Falah Alwan (right) and workers at a demonstration for labor rights in Baghdad. (Photo: David Bacon)

Hadi was one of Baghdad’s first protesters, leading marches of unemployed workers to the gates of the Green Zone, where US occupation chief Paul Bremer had his offices, almost as soon as Bremer moved in. On July 25, following the May 2003 invasion, Hadi was arrested by US troops for protesting. For the next six years, he led one protest after another, making the UUI a thorn in the side, first of the US occupation administration, and then of the Iraqi regimes that followed.

Some government representatives tried to stop the union’s growth with bribes. “They said they’d give us a position in the Labor Ministry and make us responsible for unemployed people,” Hadi says. Those attempts were unsuccessful because, he explains, “we belong to the union because we want civil rights, not for ourselves, but for all people.”

When bribes didn’t work, threats followed. “A representative of the Dawa Party (the party of Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki) told us to leave the union,” Hadi recalls. “If we didn’t, he said we’d be enemies of the people of Iraq. We know what this language means. They will kidnap you. They’ll make holes in your body with a drill. They will kill you slowly, with lots of pain.”

Hadi isn’t exaggerating. During the years of US occupation, many union organizers have been murdered, some, like Hadi Saleh, brutally tortured first. “People who get threatened like this change the place where they sleep many times,” he says. “Sometimes they go live in another city. I don’t care what they do to me. I have a dream I’m fighting for. But when they threatened to kidnap my wife and children I couldn’t stay.” A year ago, Hadi left Iraq.

A stand where the children of oil refinery workers sell motor oil to passing drivers.  Workers at the refinery are paid part of their wages in oil because the refinery doesn't have enough money to pay them cash.A stand where the children of oil refinery workers sell motor oil to passing drivers. Workers at the refinery are paid part of their wages in oil because the refinery doesn’t have enough money to pay them cash. (Photo: David Bacon)

He describes enormous economic pressure on families. “Prices are very high and millions of people have no income at all,” he elaborates. “Even for those who have a job, wages are so low you see people on the street selling all their furniture. If they get a sugar ration, they sell it instead. People stop drinking tea because they have to spend all their money just on the food they need to stay alive. It surprises me how people can survive.”

The Iraqi government only counts two million unemployed and pays unemployment benefits to a quarter of them. Benefits are low, about $110 a month and if there’s more than one unemployed person in the family, they reduce the benefit. But the worst problem, the UUI says, is that you have to register with the governing political party at the same time you register for benefits. “If you oppose the governing party, you can’t register,” Hadi says. “Benefits are given out as political bribes.”

Unemployment, hunger and corruption were the fuel that fed the rising wave of protest that culminated in Iraq’s Day of Rage at the end of this February.

At the beginning of the month, Baghdad neighborhoods saw rallies calling for dismissing and jailing corrupt officials, including those involved in election fraud. Al-Kuray’at neighbors protested declining services, while the people of Al-Mutanabbi Street demanded more freedom. Some held banners saying “The Baghdad Municipality is wasting billions and the capital is sleeping in trash.” Other banners had warnings for the government: “O inhabitants of the Green Zone – think about the others” and “Remember the fate of Arab dictatorship regimes and how their people revolted.” On Al-Fardaws Avenue in central Baghdad, protesters accused a security company of executing an Al-Ma’lif man in front of his children, and called for ending random arrests and home invasions by police.

Unemployed men demonstrate outside the office of a contractor who had promised them work.Unemployed men demonstrate outside the office of a contractor who had promised them work. (Photo: David Bacon)

One of the sorest points for Iraqis has been the lack of more than a couple of hours of electricity a day and skyrocketing prices for gasoline and diesel oil, not just for vehicles, but for the small generators many people now use to run their air conditioners in summer heat that can reach 120 degrees.

Fight the lies and misinformation; support truth! Please make a tax-deductible donation to Truthout today and keep real independent journalism strong.

Last summer, Basra was rocked by protests over the lack of services. Police put down June demonstrations over blackouts, supported by the Iraqi Electrical Utility Workers Union, the first national union led by a woman, Hashmeya Muhsin. Haider Dawood Selman was killed and several others injured. Electricity and Oil Minister Hussein al-Shahristani then issued an order to shut the union down. A thousand Basra workers protested, shouting slogans asking Shahristani where the $13 billion appropriated for electricity reconstruction had disappeared. Within days, the union was expelled from its offices as well.

A similar fate met Iraq’s oil union after it, too, protested corruption, privatization, unemployment and bad housing. Hassan Juma’a and Falih Abood, president and general secretary of the Federation of Oil Employees of Iraq, were hauled into court and threatened with arrest. The government has never taken off the books the infamous Public Law 150, issued by Saddam Hussein in 1987, which makes unions illegal for public workers, including in the oil and electricity industries.

Both Qasim Hadi and Hashmeya Muhsin charge that the electricity blackouts are not simply the result of unrepaired war damage – the claim of the US contractors like Bechtel Corp. that received billions of dollars for their (unsuccessful) reconstruction.

“Since 2005 there have been many projects to fix the electrical stations,” Hadi says, “but the money appropriated for them has been stolen. Big generators are not repaired. The workers in the stations say they can fix them, but instead they’re sold and government people pocket the money. Each new minister just demands more money and time.” In addition, Hadi says, blackouts are used to punish communities for opposing the government.

A poster in a Baghdad factory, warning workers not to pick up unexploded bombs and ordinance. (Photo: David Bacon)

A poster in a Baghdad factory, warning workers not to pick up unexploded bombs and ordinance. (Photo: David Bacon)

Muhsin incurred the government’s anger when she accused ministers last year of using blackouts and repression to create an atmosphere of desperation. “If people are desperate enough, the government believes they’ll accept anything to get electricity, including privatization,” she charges. “It knows our union won’t accept that, so it wants to paralyze us so we can’t speak out.”

Under Saddam Hussein, power was free and there were no blackouts. Today, large private generators sell power on a thriving black market at 10-15 times the government’s power price.

This year, as the February demonstrations grew, other workers joined in, including the oil and gas workers’ branch of the GFIW, which struck the refinery and fields of the North Oil Company in Kirkuk on February 13. The union demanded pay raises, especially for temporary workers who make only a tenth of a normal salary. The Mechanics and Printing Workers Union held a one-day protest in Baghdad, followed by a contingent calling itself the Youth of the 14th of February, who organized a big rally that day in Tahrir Square. In addition to the constant complaint of lack of services and corruption, young people demanded jobs.

As the month wore on, the government passed an $82 billion budget, financed almost entirely from oil revenue. Endemic corruption, however, practically guarantees that little of that will reach the country’s hungry and unemployed populace. The growing anti-government tone of the demonstrations was displayed in one large banner at a Tahrir Square rally that read, “The oil of the people is for the people, not for the thieves.”

Finally, unions, left-wing political parties, and other organizations of Iraqi civil society announced a national mobilization for February 25, the Day of Rage. The Maliki government attempted to keep turnout low by arresting leaders of organizations calling for the protest. One was Jabbar al-Asadi, a member of the Executive Bureau of the Iraq Freedom Congress (IFC) in Baghdad and a member of the People Protests Committee in Iraq. Another was IFC member Mahmood Khalis, who had applied for a rally permit for Tikrit (Saddam Hussein’s hometown.) The offices of both the Iraqi Communist Party and the Iraqi Nation Party were closed by troops as well.

Nevertheless, Yanar Mohammed, president of the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq, reported that almost 70,000 people participated in the day’s protest rallies. One demonstration in Samarra was the first tribal protest organized by women, in part because widows now make up a majority of the city’s female population. “The army shot the demonstrators in the evening,” Mohammed says, “attempting to disperse them. Seven were killed in Samarra and 15 were wounded.” According to the Iraqi Society for the Defense of Press Freedoms, 14 people were killed in Hawija, Mosul, Tikrit and Basra during the February 25 Day of Rage.

It’s hard to measure the number of people even in the Baghdad protest, the largest, because the government used force to disperse people that day, and when even more protested on the day following, tanks closed off the square.

Marwan was an IFC activist who helped organize the demonstration. He told Hadi, “When we started they surrounded us with Hummers. We were shouting slogans – ‘Give us 24-hour electricity! Give us a minimum wage! Raise the salaries of those who work! Give us unemployment benefits!’ At first we thought the authorities would protect us, but then they suddenly withdrew. Then cars rushed in full of plainclothes police. They attacked us with knives, sticks and their fists. That’s when we began demanding that the government resign.” Marwan was shot in the neck.

The government closed streets leading into Tahrir Square. While 6,000 people were able to assemble there, Hadi says, in every street around it there were many times the number of people in the square itself. Al Jazeera reported 20,000 in one street alone. “Everyone was shouting about their civil rights,” Hadi says. “Then the police and army began to attack them, so everyone sat down. They called out to the army and police, ‘There’s no reason to hit us!’ When the attacks continued people fled into the neighborhoods. The police followed, beating and shooting people. Residents let people into their homes, but then the army followed.”

If only several hundred people were brave enough to demonstrate in Baghdad’s Tahrir Square on March 4, a week later, the reason was obvious. Iraqis have never become inured to high levels of violence, even after eight years of occupation. But it is not likely that shooting demonstrators and a massive show of force will end the protests sweeping Iraq. Instead, the state’s violence has pushed protesters into moving beyond calls for better conditions to demands that the government itself resign.

“The government says we’re Baathists or Al Qaeda,” says Qasim Hadi. “That’s their main tactic – try to scare people, to say we’re going back to 2003. But it’s a lie. They know the people don’t want them. They’re just the government because the US and Iran helped them get power with threats and militias and the military. But I believe people will lose their fear and the protests will get bigger and bigger.”

Victory for Iraqi Leather Industry Workers as Strikes Spread

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Thanks to our friend Ali Issa (formerly in Austin, now in New York) for the link to his blog, Iraq Left: On Iraqi Organizing and Movement Building Now, http://iraqleft.wordpress.com/

(The Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq is a left-led, independent labor federation that has had a lot of communication and solidarity with U.S. Labor Against the War.  The reference to the “Ba’athi move of banning ‘unrecognized’ unions” recalls Saddam Hussein’s edict banning public sector unions.  This was one of the few Saddam-era laws kept on the books by the U.S. occupation.)

January 2, 2010

After a 53-day strike (the longest in Iraq since 1931) won workers in the leather industry the release of long promised safety benefits and back wages, FWCUI-affiliated unions are at it again, this time organizing Baghdad cotton factory workers and announcing a strike for similar demands, now entering its 19th day. There is yet a another strike, this one in the industrial area of Nahrawan (east of Baghdad) at al-Thalal brick factory. This strike began on the 23rd of December. If these actions are any indication, organizing in the industrial sector is really catching fire in Iraq. In the face of such effective and uncompromising direct action, the Iraqi authorities –surprise, surprise—have stepped up their attempts to interfere, by “relocating” organizers to out of the way offices, or simply firing them. The most threatening of these attempts though, takes the form of planned union federation elections, which the FWCUI considers to be a sham meant only to confer legitimacy on the state-backed federation. This then may lead to the very Ba’athi move of banning of all ‘unrecognized’ unions.

Here’s an earlier post with background on the same subject.  Privatization is an issue everywhere:

November 26, 2009

The Baghdad based  Federation of Worker’s Councils and Unions in Iraq (FWCUI) has called for an expansion of the now 41 day-old leather industries strike, into other industries and sectors across Iraq. In their call (which you can read in the original Arabic here, and in English translation here) they cite numerous wage and condition-related grievances, but also emphasize what Iraqi labor unions have for decades been struggling against:  a 1987 law, enforced to this day, which prohibits worker organizing in the public sector, in addition to various economic initiatives which they see as threatening the public sector’s very existence. The FWCUI’s analysis also has a broader reach, and considers these moves an expression of the desire on the part of the Iraqi Government, multi-nationals, and the US-led occupation, to privatize nearly all Iraqi industry.

The agreement between America and the Iraqi Government Undermines the Will of Iraqi Society

Monday, December 15th, 2008
The agreement between America and the Iraqi Government Undermines the Will of Iraqi Society

by Falah Alwan, President Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq
December 5th, 2008

Since several months there was a preparation to sign what is referred to as a “Security Agreement” between America and Iraq.  This agreement is presented as an opportunity for Iraq to achieve sovereignty.  The political forces that endorse this “agreement” are presenting it as an agreement for the withdrawal of American forces in Iraq.

Before the political position is presented, the reality is that America and the authorities that support it, are trying to push through an agreement at a time when (Iraqi) society is busy trying to secure their daily bread and trying to deal with the lack of basic life necessities such as electricity, water, and medicine.  The forces of liberation are scattered at the moment and are unable to effectively stall this project and to instill the will of society which is the project of the immediate ending of the occupation.

The insistence on removing Iraq from the sanctions through this agreement is bad because Iraq was placed under sanctions by the United Nations in 1990 because of a “security threat in the area” and force was used against it  after the invasion of Kuwait.  So the countries that are placed under the sanctions are the countries that that are involved in threats and attacks.  There were several conditions on removing Iraq from sanctions  which were implemented and they were: the withdrawal from Kuwait and to make the borders official and to recognize the Kuwaiti government and  to repay debts and release prisoners.  All these conditions were met and yet the economic embargo continued to be enforced and subject the people to great pains.

What should fall under sanctions according to the UN documents is America, which occupied Iraq after a vicious military invasion formed a threat to the region.  Underneath the sound and fury which the US and the authorities in Iraq propoagating is the distortion of facts to pass the so called “security agreement.”

Since the agreement does call for the withdrawal of the forces of occupation, which has never been a force of stability.  On the contrary the bloody ethnic and religious infighting arrived with the  arrival of the (American) tanks.  So this agreement is the last link in the progress of the American project to transform Iraq into an arena where the American forces can run amok and create a perpetual threat to its security and peace.

What is occurring right now is not an agreement, because an agreement happens between two parties with equal will and freedom of choice.  For Iraq’s situation is that it is under American occupation and American tanks fill its streets, alleyways and villages.  So the agreement with America is nothing but an opportunity to provide legal justification for the permanent presence of the occupational forces.

There will not be any legitimate agreement, no with American or with another without the withdrawal of its forces from Iraq and the ending of the occupation because there is no peace with the entity that stole security from (Iraqi) society.

Despite the false claims and the distractions, the people have expressed their refusal to the agreement on several occasions – in demonstration, conferences and rallies and political positions.  The people have expressed all this despite the dangerous state of our security and despite the bombings that have been occurring. All the while, the political forces in the parliament and in the ministries are flip flopping and maneuvering for their own political gain.

The rejection of the agreement by the Federation of Workers’ Councils and Unions in Iraq, which represents tens of thousands of workers (whether members of supporters) is the most prominent formulation of the rejection of this agreement by the people.  This places their position in an official, publicized arena. And this is precisely the duty of the organization and federations and political forces that reject this (security) agreement.

We invite the forces which reject this agreement to place their opposition in the political arena to widen the public discourse and to transform the rejection of this agreement to an empowerment of the people – to exercise its will and to prevent the passing of this agreement, which is diametrically opposed to its interests, behind its back.

We ask the forces of resistance to the occupation to support the forces of rejection of this agreement in its stand against in approval.

Long live the will of the people.